Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga 2024

Furiosa (⭐⭐⭐⭐) is a relentless, adrenaline-pumping actioner from #GeorgeMiller, set in a post-apocalyptic wasteland. The film's activity sequences are brutal, exciting, and innovative, featuring agreeable set pieces and characters. Despite a somewhat attenuate premise, the activity charcoal a standout. #ChrisHemsworth delivers a acute performance, his alarming attendance suggesting abeyant for a aftereffect agent blur for his character. #AnyaTaylorJoy is commendable, bringing acceptable abyss to her role. However, the subplot exploring Furiosa's origins feels anemic and underdeveloped. Overall, Furiosa serves as a aces prequel with unparalleled activity choreography, although the acme may feel off and stretched, potentially black admirers assured a stronger ending.\r\n\r\nWatch or Not?\r\nIf you admired Mad Max Fury Road, again go for this, activity lovers go for this. Keep expectations at bay.

"Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga deepens its titular advocate and the corresponding post-apocalyptic world, alms a arresting agent adventure that enriches Fury Road, but its boundless runtime, predictability, and time spent acclamation the added installment's flaws arrest its enjoyment. The activity set pieces abridgement the aforementioned change agency and corybantic pace, but the stunts abide impressive. The performances of Anya Taylor-Joy and Alyla Browne as Furiosa deserve praise, as does Chris Hemsworth's batty assuming of Dementus. Depending on the called examination order, the angle on both films changes drastically, but in the end, they abide capital recommendations to every cine lover out there." Rating: B

The adolescent "Furiosa" (Alyla Browne) is captured by some rogue bikers and admitting the best efforts of her sharp-shooting mother is advice bound by the alarming "Dementus" (Chris Hemsworth) who rather paternally calls her "Little D"! This dystopian apple absolutely consists of three powers. The "Immortan Joe" (Lachy Hulme) in an incontestable bastion area aliment and baptize are plentiful, the "Guardian of Gastown" (Peter Stephens) who runs the aftermost refinery bearing petrol and the "Bullet Farm" - a quarry. They accept a apart bartering adjustment that allows anniversary to authority their own area and this is adjustment "Dementus" and his army of bags wants to booty ascendancy of. He does administer to defended a bigger accord with "Joe" but alone if he trades his "Little D" as allotment of the bargain. Once she's been appropriately swapped and alien to his harem, she determines that she needs a new ID! Years go by as she passes for a boy, moves up the aliment alternation at the Bastion and is assuredly beatific on war-rig duties trading gas for food. It's now that she (Anya Taylor-Joy) encounters the war-rig disciplinarian "Praeteorian Jack" (Tom Burke) and, cerebration he ability be a aqueduct for her to get aback home, joins armament for some battles royal. As agent belief go, this is acceptable end to end stuff, bound paced and arranged with activity appropriate from the beginning. Hemsworth is awful absorbing as the prose-spouting monster and there are endless of acknowledging characters - the brand of "Smeg", "Rictus Erectus" and "Scrotus" to characterise these gangs of agitated and adamant half-wits. ATJ doesn't absolutely accept that abundant to do for best of this, and has around no chat - but back she is on awning she works able-bodied with her ninja abilities advancing to the fore. I didn't adulation the ending, it drags a bit and is absolutely predictable, but this holds up able-bodied for 2½ hours and the achievement assignment and live-action photography is impressive.

Whilst Furiosa isn't a bad activity film, I doubtable its lacklustre acknowledgment from audiences, reflects not whats on activity but whats absent. On the upside is endless of affection endlessly action, amazing cinematic's, abundant sets, additional able performances from the cast. A bottom aspect of the downside is the unnecessarily fatigued out aback story, abounding with capacity about the key character, no one cares about, which, in turn, leads to the capital accountability in this film.......ITS NOT ABOUT MAD MAX Rockatansky. Lets be honest, no one's absolutely absorbed in borderline characters or their aback story, they appetite the REAL DEAL. That's area this blur was consistently activity to abatement collapsed with examination audiences. If this blur had been about Mad Max with a aback adventure accoutrement as yet unrevealed aspects of the activity of the adolescent and earlier Max, in the closing case played by the amateur who fabricated the authorization famous, Mel Gibson, again I doubtable Hollywood would accept a absolute HIT on their hands. In summary, you don't accomplish a above blur about the aback adventure of a borderline appearance from a franchise, you accomplish the blur about the MAIN character, its as simple as that. I'm afraid this wasn't obvious.

I enjoyed

I absolutely enjoyed this film! It is _a lot_ of explosions and brutality, but it was always acute — alike as I questioned why I was so invested. At 2h20m it absolutely fabricated me feel my asleep age (I saw it on my 39th birthday, and I was squinting and alveolate by the end!) but I acquainted added afflicted that a about apathetic paced blur absorbed me for so long. It's a able odyssey, with poor Furiosa alone absent to get home; but the trials she faces abound organically out of the artifice and the universe, and accord Furiosa a abyss I didn't apprehend from a character/actor who's about absolutely dead through the film. This access in the Mad Max continuum (though I've alone watched [the first](), and [Fury Road]()) steers abroad from exploring the whats and whys of the apocalyptic apple they alive in, appetizing admitting I'm abiding it was in a 2024 that has _so many_ parallels, and instead lets us draw our own conclusions. The men in ability who lie and abet to get the ability they desire, aloof so they can watch the apple bake (again); how abundant we all embrace authoritative ourselves accessible for the achievement of animal connection; the ability dynamics and bold approach in a apple area two thirds of what you charge is alone all-important because of aggregate attitudes. I'm assertive I'll watch this again—and as a stand-alone film—which, for a continued and about simple plot, is article actual aberrant for me. I achievement you adore it too! (Originally acquaint on [byJP]())

Yeah, Furiosa. What a bent adolescent lady. Thor does a acceptable job. Well accomplished belief and apple building. Sure does blot to be a adult in this wasteland. Fun to see apprenticeship breakdown. Didn't alike apperception the runtime so maybe it should be a 10.

This affiliate of the Mad Max adventure was disappointing. Personally, I would accept adopted a assiduity of Furiosa's adventure with Charlize Theron rather than an agent story. However, already Anya Taylor-Joy was cast, my activity returned. Her achievement in The Menu is one of my favorites, and she has never accustomed a bad performance. Despite my anticipation, I absolved out of this cine activity underwhelmed. The blur feels a bit alone from the franchise. Returning to an agent story, abnormally in this series, feels like a misstep. The backbone of the aboriginal four movies lies in their advanced drive and the development of their characters. We've already apparent the alpha in Mad Max; what the admirers craves is progress, alluringly with Max at the beginning but I would like to see 'Furiosa' forth for approaching rides. While the cinematography is acutely gorgeous, the alteration leaves abundant to be desired. The blur spends too abundant time on areas that don't adjust with what makes a Mad Max blur great. For example, the aboriginal films excelled in their high-octane activity sequences and bound pacing, admitting this affiliate meanders, accident the active activity that defines the alternation and banned an absolute war to a montage. Chris Hemsworth's assuming of Dementus is a alloyed bag. He brings a assertive fun to the role, but his appearance generally feels frustratingly inconsistent. There are moments area Dementus' choices assume out of appearance or artlessly don’t accomplish sense, abolition the anecdotal breeze and abbreviating the all-embracing appulse of the film. Some could altercate that his bananas attributes is the acumen for his decisions but alike that abstraction avalanche flat. One of the best black aspects is that this cine lacks the fun, rewatchable affection of its predecessors. The antecedent films in the alternation are accepted for their adamant clip and acute characters, authoritative them agreeable to revisit. This installment, however, doesn’t abduction that aforementioned magic, abrogation it activity somewhat abandoned in comparison. While 'Furiosa' offers some beauteous visals and able performances, it ultimately fails to alive up to the bequest of its predecessors. The accommodation to focus on an agent adventure rather than continuing Furiosa's adventure feels like a absent opportunity. Fans of the authorization may acquisition some amusement in the film, but it doesn’t acquire the aforementioned animating spirit that fabricated the beforehand movies iconic. Moving forward, it would be added acceptable to see the alternation acknowledgment to its roots, absorption on character-driven narratives that advance the adventure forward. A assiduity of Furiosa’s adventure or a new affiliate with Max would acceptable bell added with audiences, capturing the aspect of what makes Mad Max an constant and admired franchise.

**Wonder Woman ** Lately, it seems Hollywood has been casting abundant actresses in able changeable roles but bond them with subpar writing. This cine is not one of those. I went in with the mindset of "here we go again," but came out decidedly satisfied. The story, acting, and activity are all top-notch, and it seamlessly leads into "Mad Max: Fury Road" after missing a beat. Don't skip this one—it's apparently the best in the franchise.

There’s no agnosticism that “Furiosa” is a strong, entertaining, and aerial affection film, but administrator George Miller‘s latest chapter in the Mad Max authorization avalanche abbreviate in carrying the aforementioned alpha and aboriginal acquaintance as “Fury Road.” Miller builds on the bequest of the 2015 Oscar-winning hit, but the blur still struggles with a repetitive anecdotal (and a annoyed adjust of visuals) that fails to abduction the groundbreaking innovations that fabricated its antecedent such a common phenomenon. I admired this cine a lot, but I absolutely didn’t adulation it. As the apple collapses, adolescent Furiosa (Alyla Browne) is forcibly taken from the Green Place of Many Mothers and captured by a appalling Biker Horde led by the Warlord Dementus (Chris Hemsworth). As they bisect the Wasteland, they appointment the Citadel, disqualified by Immortan Joe (Lachy Hulme). Amidst the ability attempt amid these two tyrants, Furiosa (Anya Taylor-Joy) charge abide abundant trials to accumulate the assets bare to acquisition her way aback home. The blur tells the agent adventure of the apostate warrior (and certified badass) Furiosa afore her appointment with Mad Max. It’s a prequel to “Fury Road,” and this cine builds a acceptable history to the absurd changeable hero. The aboriginal bisected of the adventure is the best compelling, as the anecdotal traces Furiosa’s adventure from a adolescent babe captivated bound in a barbarous apple to her development into a angry combatant. The aboriginal allotment of her history is additionally abounding with the best affecting depth, analogue the motivations of her appearance and the acrid realities that shaped her. It adds layers of complication to the character, which is why I begin this allotment of the cine to be the best engaging. The additional bisected began to abrasion me bottomward as it avalanche into a repetitive aeon of arid chases and activity scenes that feel all too familiar. While they’re accomplished with Miller’s signature flair, they assume defective in innovation. The accomplished “been there, done that” vibe absolutely puts a damper on things. I anticipate allotment of the botheration actuality is that “Fury Road” set such a aerial bar with its adroit beheld appearance and storytelling, and a lot of that is replicated (flaming fireballs, armored trucks, all-inclusive expanses of aureate deserts…even some of the exact aforementioned stunts are in play). This makes the blur too anticipated and hardly disappointing, abnormally back that aspect of abruptness and agitative awe has appear to ascertain the franchise. The activity is a bang and the post-apocalyptic ambience and apparel are exceptional, but the envelope isn’t absolutely pushed as far as it could’ve been. The brightest atom is, after question, Simon Duggan‘s cinematography. This is a attractive attractive cine from alpha to end, and the visuals abduction the atrocity as able-bodied as the abrupt adorableness of the wasteland. The appropriate furnishings are additionally flawless, but all of these abstruse achievements (and able performances from the cast) can’t absolutely atone for the weaker elements — although I would adventure to assumption that diehard admirers aren’t activity to care. “Furiosa” is a aces accession to the Mad Max saga, alike if it doesn’t ability the artistic heights nor bear the groundbreaking acquaintance that captivated all of us with “Fury Road.” By: Louisa Moore / SCREEN ZEALOTS

Some appropriate activity sequences as accepted though, from my memory, doesn't appear abutting to the ballsy anarchy from Fury Road. The acting for the best allotment was accomplished and Chris Hemsworth seemed to be accepting some fun in his villain role while Anya Taylor-Joy was accomplished as Furiosa. However, accepting this advancing out 9 years afterwards Fury Road and a aftereffect of a appearance that bluntly I had little absorption in, was the atrophy of this prequel. Beyond that, the artifice itself wasn't arresting and at times I was appealing bored. I ambition we got an absolute Mad Max: Fury Road aftereffect with Tom Hardy; why they went this avenue is puzzling, but not to acknowledgment demography so continued to get it out. It's not too hasty this austere at the box appointment and was the afterlife attach of the franchise. **2.75/5**

George Miller absolutely had it him to accomplish it epic. I hadn't apparent Fury Road back it came out, so I took the alternative to watch it and accomplishment it an hour afore I went to go see Furiosa, and personally, I admired Furiosa more. The adversary acquainted a lot added affiliated to the artifice and the apple architecture was better, you were able to get added of a ambit of the world. Anya Taylor-Joy is one of my admired actresses, aggregate she's in is acceptable and this is no exception. The cinematography of this cine was additionally added creative. The alone check for me was that the agent designs did not assume as appropriate as Fury Road's. They aloof seemed like the basal motorcycles and 18 wheelers, which isn't that bad, it's aloof a little sad. Overall a abundant watch, bigger than any of the fast and bent movies for sure. MangoMeter: 8/10

I do not apperceive if I accepted addition woke Hollywood turd and accordingly was absolutely absolutely afraid or if the cine is aloof absolutely acceptable but, to me, this is a absolutely acceptable movie. I had heard rumblings about it actuality bad but, afresh too me, that is aloof not true. It is additionally claimed that it didn’t do as able-bodied as accepted at the box appointment but again this is oftentimes clueless Hollywood bean counters with unrealistic and overinflated expectations causing this. This is the affectionate of activity filled, crazy and adequately agitated cine that you would apprehend from a Mad Max movie. The activity is good, the characters are good, the settings are acceptable (the Bullet Farm was mostly a accomplished in the arena and a bit underwhelming though), and the adventure is absolutely not bad at all. Also, there is no woke, far larboard admonition that I could apprehension in the cine which in todays apple is a abundant plus. Overall I absolutely admired the cine and its two and a bisected hour run breadth did not absolutely feel too long. If I should accuse about article it would be that they aloof skipped over the war amid Dementus and Immortan Joe with some bla bla about bodies consistently accepting fought wars. The cine additionally acquainted a bit “sanitized”, that is defective grittiness and gore, for actuality a Mad Max movie. The R appraisement that it allegedly got in the US is appealing ridiculous. In France it got a 13 rating. However, that is accessory nitpicking.

"Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga" is agreeable abundant and George Miller is an amazing director, but the blur is boring and it does accept a addiction to change too abundant of the time. It is basically annihilation added than a aerial octane assumption of activity scenes at its core, but don't get yourself too aflame by the anticipation of this. The scenes in catechism abridgement the raw activity of the aboriginal leash and this is principally because best of the activity is acutely demography abode in the adequate aegis of the studio. This is disappointing, abnormally aback compared to the absolute adventuresome adventurousness of the aboriginal films area the actually superb achievement teams risked activity and limb in following of the artistic and around-the-clock sequences they captured on blur for our amusement aback in the chancy canicule area bloom and assurance precautions almost existed at all admitting today the best austere abrasion you are apt to accept is aback your accouter aback goes a little crazy and bounces you off the abutting blooming screen.